"One Must Speak, One Cannot Speak" : Fiction, memory and genre hybridity in transitional South Africa and Argentina

The last decades have seen a proliferation of truth commissions, in Latin America, Eastern Europe and South Africa, whose Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) is arguably the most ambitious to date. The post-modern philosophical angst about the pursuit of truth thus paradoxically coincides with a renewed political confidence in the same process as the panacea to break away from authoritarian and violent pasts. In South Africa, the typical mixed-genre literature of the post-apartheid transition (Coetzee, Krog, Ndebele, Wicomb) mirrors the inter-disciplinary complexity of the TRC itself. Moreover it seems to provide a form in which to deal with the horrific past and take possession of history, in accordance with Jean-François Lyotard’s suggestion that the liminal experiences of our time demand new genres adequate to their unspeakability.South Africa’s disputed reconciliation process stands in stark contrast to Argentina, whose latest and most murderous military regime (1976-82) remains largely unrevealed. It is only in the last years that fiction writers have begun to look its holocaust in the face (Feijóo, Kohan, Pauls, Saccomanno), often through the experience of the children of the disappeared (Alcoba, Bruzzone).By a comparative reading of recent novels from the two countries, I will discuss the relation between truth and fiction, and the (potential) role of literature both as a means of truth-seeking and as a vehicle for advocacy that goes beyond merely memorial reconstruction